You may find creating a mind map useful in highlighting some of the key issues of your review question. The following resources may be useful:
Starting your systematised literature review can be a daunting task. The video below shows you how to approach choosing your research question and formulating inclusion and exclusion criteria.
To complete a successful review you will need to choose a appropriate question. As a general rule, your question needs to be closed and specific rather than general and open. In the business field, however, systematised questions are more open than some other disciplines. Your question should be:
Too much or too little?
Students often think they have to think up an exact question before they consult literature, this can cause the following two problems:
When this happens there is a tendency to panic!
Don’t panic: instead, the below exercises are a good way to start:
Exercise One
1. Pick a broad topic of interest — some examples might be “leadership”, “phonics” or “forest schools”
2. Start consulting literature by carrying out some scoping searches in Google Scholar or a subject specific database. Begin by reading broadly then focus in on specific areas; let the literature shape and form your question.
3. Start to refine a more specific question based on your scoping searches. Your question will be specific enough when you can identify a clear body of literature (not too much or too little) that fits the scope of your question.
Exercise Two
Some of our most popular social science databases can be found below. A full list can be found in our A-Z databases page.
Access to the Emerald database of full-text articles covering a range of subjects from management, marketing, economics, engineering, health and social care and tourism.
Provides access to all SAGE journals covering a wide range of subject areas including business, humanities, social sciences, science, technology and medicine periodicals.
Access journals, reference works and current protocols covering a range of scientific, medical, technical and professional disciplines.
Multi-disciplinary journals, reports and proceedings.
When you are choosing your question, you may like to use the PICO framework. Predominantly used in healthcare, PICO stands for:
P | Population / Patient / Problem | What population or patient group are the investigators working with? It can also refer to the problem being investigated |
I
|
Intervention | What intervention is the intervention group receiving? |
C |
Comparison / Control | Is there a control group, and if so, what intervention is the control group receiving? |
O
|
Outcome |
What outcomes are being measured and how? |
Taken from: How To Use The PICO Framework To Aid Critical Appraisal: https://casp-uk.net/pico-framework/
When you have formulated your question and done some scoping searches, you need to formulate your inclusion and exclusion criteria. This formally delineates the literature you will include and exclude in your review. This information needs to be presented in your write up (normally as a table).
The nature of your criteria will depend on your question (no two questions are the same), but some key variables to consider might be:
Here are two examples of inclusion and exclusion criteria from published reviews.
Taken from: Olsson, J., Hellström, D. and Pålsson, H. (2019) Framework of last mile logistics research: A systematic review of the literature. Sustainability, 11(24) 7131. Available from https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247131 [accessed 2nd February 2024].
Taken from: Viu-Roig, M. and Alvarez-Palau, E.J., (2020) The impact of E-Commerce-related last-mile logistics on cities: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 12(16) 6492. Available from https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166492 [accessed 2nd February 2024]